#Super metroid randomizer bad checksum drivers

Model 3 production is still lagging behind Musk’s twice adjusted targets. He didn’t make those targets, he didn’t come close. For example, when he announced the Model 3 he claimed production targets that every Wall Street analyst claimed were absurd. His track record on business statements is abysmal. If “credibility” is the concern, then it’s the classic Bond villain here that’s the problem: Musk himself. For example, the NYTimes reporters do a lot of stories quoting anonymous government sources in clear violation of journalistic principles. When I criticize journalists for their poor handling of stories in my industry, I try to focus on which journalistic principles they get wrong. When such stories criticize “autopilot”, but don’t do their diligence in getting Tesla’s side of the story, then that’s a violation of journalistic practice. What you can criticize a journalist for is therefore not “core truth” but whether they did journalism correctly. The facts are in such cases that the accident happened, and they try to get Tesla or Musk to comment on it. What the press satisfies itself with instead is smaller truths, what they can document. What’s “core truth” is thus rather difficult to obtain. Yes, the press unduly covers Tesla autopilot crashes, but Musk has only himself to blame by unduly exaggerating his car’s capabilities by calling it “autopilot”.

In many ways, the technology is behind - my Tesla doesn’t beep at me when a pedestrian walks behind my car while backing up, but virtually every new car on the market does. It’s little different than “lane keeping” and “adaptive cruise control” you can now find in other cars. The public is overrating the capabilities of the feature. Autopilot may still be safer, it’s just that the numbers Musk uses don’t demonstrate this.Īnd then there is the truth calling it “autopilot” to begin with, because it isn’t. Musk is therefore being intentionally deceptive comparing apples to oranges.

#Super metroid randomizer bad checksum drivers

People choose autopilot only when conditions are incredibly safe and drivers are unlikely to have an accident anyway. Autopilot is used primarily on freeways, which already have a low mile-per-mile accident rate. Yes, on a mile-per-mile basis, autopilot is safer, but there’s nuance here. Therefore, the press’s fixation on Tesla crashes is illegitimate “fake news”, titillating the audience with distorted truth.īut here’s the thing: that’s still only Musk’s version of the truth. He argues that autopilot is safer than humans driving, and he’s got the statistics and government studies to back this up. He’s got good reason to be concerned about this. Musk spies on Tesla drivers (hello, classic Bond villain everyone) so he can see the dip in autopilot usage every time such a news story breaks. Pretty much every autopilot crash makes national headlines, while the press ignores the other 40,000 car crashes that happen in the United States each year. This legitimacy isn’t measured by whether they follow established journalism ethics, but whether their “core truths” agree with Musk’s “core truths”.Īn example of the problem is how the press fixates on Tesla car crashes due to its “autopilot” feature. I see this in my own industry, cybersecurity, and I frequently criticize them for their suckage.īut what he’s doing here is not correcting them when they make mistakes (or what Musk sees as mistakes), but questioning their legitimacy. Journalists do suck, and many suck consistently.